×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 7,593 articles on LGBTQIA+ Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    LGBTQIA+ Wiki
    7,593Articles

    User talk:Jeb CC: Difference between revisions

    Content added Content deleted
    No edit summary
    Line 23: Line 23:
    - Asdreemurr844
    - Asdreemurr844


    :Hey Asdreemurr,
    == Discordplatonic ==
    :Cupiosexual does have that same usage as they can be used with other labels, and something like Cupioheterosexual, etc.

    :You should also ensure pages are sourced to an external site.
    A while ago, a message appeared in my mod section saying that a page I made doesn't fit wiki standards because of a lack of history/resources, even though this is not the case. I have searched through my history, and I can't find out who did it. Can you please shed some light on this? -Nevala
    -
    Hey Nevala, it wasn't formatted correctly in the first instance but you had resolved it soon afterwards so no problem there. :) [[User:Jeb CC|Jeb_CC, Co-Bureaucrat | (xe/xem/xir)]] ([[User talk:Jeb CC|talk]]) 22:32, March 7, 2022 (UTC)

    Revision as of 02:43, 6 April 2022

    Notice I'm changing a lot of pages? Please note I'm sweeping the wiki to adhere to our current standards. For each page I am...

    • Archiving Resources
    • Changing categorisation to only include the lowest sub-category(s). This is to improve organisation and make pages easier to find. Preferably we would like users to rely on the category tree function, which can get very messy if every Coric gender is also added to the Xenogender category. Adding sub-category identities to large umbrellas can end up drowning out the pages that do no fit into a sub-category.
    • Adding unverified + no history pages to Candidate for Deletion category.

    I am also removing redundant categories, templates, and just performing general housekeeping. Please let me know if there's any issues. - Jeb, 11/02/2022.


    Reply here

    Gayfocus and Lesbianfocus

    hello! I am writing about the deleted "gayfocus" and "lesbianfocus" labels

    they are not the same as cupiosexual, because they are supposed to be used together with labels in the asexual and aromantic spectrum (including greasexual/greyaromantic, demisexual/demiromantic, and others)

    and cupiosexuals can also use these labels to describe that they are only interested in masculine/feminine characters - Asdreemurr844

    Hey Asdreemurr,
    Cupiosexual does have that same usage as they can be used with other labels, and something like Cupioheterosexual, etc.
    You should also ensure pages are sourced to an external site.
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.