No edit summary |
Osteophage (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Yeah, that makes sense. I could rename it, or I could make the page a redirect. However, I feel as though the romantic orientation page should at least mention the split attraction model as a term, since it's still a commonly used term within the a-spec community. [[User:Chaoticcylinder|Chaoticcylinder]] ([[User talk:Chaoticcylinder|talk]]) 23:43, May 18, 2020 (UTC) |
Yeah, that makes sense. I could rename it, or I could make the page a redirect. However, I feel as though the romantic orientation page should at least mention the split attraction model as a term, since it's still a commonly used term within the a-spec community. [[User:Chaoticcylinder|Chaoticcylinder]] ([[User talk:Chaoticcylinder|talk]]) 23:43, May 18, 2020 (UTC) |
||
I could write a section about it on the Romantic Orientation page and then make this page redirect to that one. Does that work? [[User:Osteophage|Osteophage]] ([[User talk:Osteophage|talk]]) 00:09, May 19, 2020 (UTC)osteophage |
|||
Revision as of 00:09, 19 May 2020
Is there a way for page names to be changed? Having a page on here called "split attraction model" is like the equivalent having a page for "radiqweer" instead of queer. Alternatively, the irrelevant information (already moved to Romantic Orientation) could be removed and the page rewritten. See explanation here. Osteophage (talk) 22:05, May 18, 2020 (UTC)osteophage
Yeah, that makes sense. I could rename it, or I could make the page a redirect. However, I feel as though the romantic orientation page should at least mention the split attraction model as a term, since it's still a commonly used term within the a-spec community. Chaoticcylinder (talk) 23:43, May 18, 2020 (UTC)
I could write a section about it on the Romantic Orientation page and then make this page redirect to that one. Does that work? Osteophage (talk) 00:09, May 19, 2020 (UTC)osteophage