Content added Content deleted
Osteophage (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Is there a way for page names to be changed? Having a page on here called "split attraction model" is like the equivalent having a page for "radiqweer" instead of queer. Alter...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there a way for page names to be changed? Having a page on here called "split attraction model" is like the equivalent having a page for "radiqweer" instead of queer. Alternatively, the irrelevant information (already moved to [[Romantic Orientation]]) could be removed and the page rewritten. [https://theacetheist.wordpress.com/2020/05/18/history-term-split-attraction-model/ See explanation here.] [[User:Osteophage|Osteophage]] ([[User talk:Osteophage|talk]]) 22:05, May 18, 2020 (UTC)osteophage |
Is there a way for page names to be changed? Having a page on here called "split attraction model" is like the equivalent having a page for "radiqweer" instead of queer. Alternatively, the irrelevant information (already moved to [[Romantic Orientation]]) could be removed and the page rewritten. [https://theacetheist.wordpress.com/2020/05/18/history-term-split-attraction-model/ See explanation here.] [[User:Osteophage|Osteophage]] ([[User talk:Osteophage|talk]]) 22:05, May 18, 2020 (UTC)osteophage |
||
Yeah, that makes sense. I could rename it, or I could make the page a redirect. However, I feel as though the romantic orientation page should at least mention the split attraction model as a term, since it's still a commonly used term within the a-spec community. [[User:Chaoticcylinder|Chaoticcylinder]] ([[User talk:Chaoticcylinder|talk]]) 23:43, May 18, 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:43, 18 May 2020
Is there a way for page names to be changed? Having a page on here called "split attraction model" is like the equivalent having a page for "radiqweer" instead of queer. Alternatively, the irrelevant information (already moved to Romantic Orientation) could be removed and the page rewritten. See explanation here. Osteophage (talk) 22:05, May 18, 2020 (UTC)osteophage
Yeah, that makes sense. I could rename it, or I could make the page a redirect. However, I feel as though the romantic orientation page should at least mention the split attraction model as a term, since it's still a commonly used term within the a-spec community. Chaoticcylinder (talk) 23:43, May 18, 2020 (UTC)