mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[User:Chaoticcylinder|Chaoticcylinder]] ([[User talk:Chaoticcylinder|talk]]) 01:33, March 15, 2020 (UTC) |
[[User:Chaoticcylinder|Chaoticcylinder]] ([[User talk:Chaoticcylinder|talk]]) 01:33, March 15, 2020 (UTC) |
||
Identity is perfect. Thanks. |
|||
I'd say that it's important to keep identity & attraction separate as page categories, since people can base their orientation labels on things other than attraction (and it's not a one-to-one formula for everyone), but generally speaking I think an attraction category could be a good idea, since there are... a ''lot ''of attraction pages. |
|||
[[User:Osteophage|Osteophage]] ([[User talk:Osteophage|talk]]) 02:20, March 15, 2020 (UTC)osteophage |
|||
Agreed, I've made a category called "Attraction" and made it a subcategory of "Terminology". I've put all of the attraction articles in there. |
|||
[[User:Chaoticcylinder|Chaoticcylinder]] ([[User talk:Chaoticcylinder|talk]]) 16:17, March 15, 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:17, 15 March 2020
Categories
Removing aro category, as a quoiromantic myself who is not aro. In a previous edit I added a section explaining the relationship between quoiromanticism and the aromantic spectrum in more detail. Is there a broader umbrella category for romantic terminology?
Osteophage (talk) 22:34, March 14, 2020 (UTC)osteophage
Ah, I see. Since all pages need a category I've put it in the generic "identity" tag for now.
Perhaps we should have a tag for attraction based terminology? It could contain things like platonic attraction and alterous attraction, and it would also be a place for things like quoiromantic and similar identities that don't quite fit in the aro-spectrum.
Chaoticcylinder (talk) 01:33, March 15, 2020 (UTC)
Identity is perfect. Thanks.
I'd say that it's important to keep identity & attraction separate as page categories, since people can base their orientation labels on things other than attraction (and it's not a one-to-one formula for everyone), but generally speaking I think an attraction category could be a good idea, since there are... a lot of attraction pages.
Osteophage (talk) 02:20, March 15, 2020 (UTC)osteophage
Agreed, I've made a category called "Attraction" and made it a subcategory of "Terminology". I've put all of the attraction articles in there.
Chaoticcylinder (talk) 16:17, March 15, 2020 (UTC)