No edit summary |
m (Protected "Pokésexual" ([Commenting=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Controversial}}{{Warning}} |
{{Controversial}}{{Warning}} |
||
{{Delete}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<span style="color:#900C3F;">'''<u><code>CW/TW: The following article contains fetishization towards animalistic creatures, potential zoophillia, and mentions of sexual slavery. If any of those topics upset you, please exit the page for your own safety.</code></u>''' |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
The term '''Pokésexual''' (also '''Pokesexual''') describes someone who is attracted to Pokémon. Pokésexuality may be related to [[Neurodivergent|zoophilia]] in some forms, due to many Pokémon being animalistic in nature. They are often associated with the [[Furries|furry community]], although this term is rarely used in these spaces and is not associated with all members. |
|||
The term '''Pokésexual''' (also '''Pokesexual''') describes someone who is attracted to Pokémon species. Pokésexual falls under the [[Fictosexual|fictiosexuality]] umbrella, due to Pokémon species being fictional. The attraction to Pokémon can range to animalistic, humanoid, inanimate, and spiritual, in which attributes paraphilias—excluding humanoids—like zoophilia, objectophilia, and spectrophilia. |
|||
== Controversy== |
== Controversy== |
||
This term is controversial in whether it is harmful or not, due to the fact that many Pokémon can communicate through non-verbal (and even sometimes verbal) ways. However, the sexualization of Pokémon is often shown through illustrated images of sexual slavery, as Pokémon are, in many cases, unable to deny their master’s commands. |
This term is controversial in whether it is harmful or not, due to the fact that many Pokémon can communicate through non-verbal (and even sometimes verbal) ways. However, the sexualization of Pokémon is often shown through illustrated images of sexual slavery, as Pokémon are, in many cases, unable to deny their master’s commands. |
||
==Acceptable |
==Acceptable attraction== |
||
There are some Pokémon that are acceptable to hold attraction to, specifically if they fit the following criteria: |
There are some Pokémon that are acceptable to hold attraction to, specifically if they fit the following criteria: |
||
| Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
*Nafarfori |
*Nafarfori |
||
<br /> |
|||
<span style="color:#900C3F;"> |
|||
[[Category:Circumstantially harmless identities]] |
[[Category:Circumstantially harmless identities]] |
||
[[Category:Beware]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:01, 4 November 2021
The term Pokésexual (also Pokesexual) describes someone who is attracted to Pokémon species. Pokésexual falls under the fictiosexuality umbrella, due to Pokémon species being fictional. The attraction to Pokémon can range to animalistic, humanoid, inanimate, and spiritual, in which attributes paraphilias—excluding humanoids—like zoophilia, objectophilia, and spectrophilia.
Controversy
This term is controversial in whether it is harmful or not, due to the fact that many Pokémon can communicate through non-verbal (and even sometimes verbal) ways. However, the sexualization of Pokémon is often shown through illustrated images of sexual slavery, as Pokémon are, in many cases, unable to deny their master’s commands.
Acceptable attraction
There are some Pokémon that are acceptable to hold attraction to, specifically if they fit the following criteria:
- They are consenting in the imagery/writing.
- They are not doing it just to abide to the trainer’s wishes.
- They are sapient and able to understand the implications.
- They can consent.
In these cases, this attraction is acceptable, however it would be better for one to identify as a term such as fictosexual, anuafsexual, objectum or similar, as Pokesexual has negative connotations. However, one may still identify as Pokesexual, so long as they clarify that their attraction is healthy.
History
This term appears to have been coined by Elkirbydiablo, on May 18th of 2009, through Urban Dictionary.