No edit summary |
m (Protected "Pokésexual" ([Commenting=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Controversial}} |
{{Controversial}}{{Warning}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
The term '''Pokésexual''', also '''Pokesexual''', describes someone who is attracted to Pokémon. It is generally observed to be related to being a [[furries]], although the majority of this community does not accept being sexually attracted to animal-like characters, even if they are fictional. |
|||
Pokésexuality may be related to [[Zoosexual|zoophilia]] in some forms. Due to Pokémon not being real however they are most likely to stick to masturbation. The term does not specify the gender of said Pokémon, but it is generally observed to be coupled to [[Bisexual|bisexuality]]. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
<br /> |
|||
The term '''Pokésexual''' (also '''Pokesexual''') describes someone who is attracted to Pokémon species. Pokésexual falls under the [[Fictosexual|fictiosexuality]] umbrella, due to Pokémon species being fictional. The attraction to Pokémon can range to animalistic, humanoid, inanimate, and spiritual, in which attributes paraphilias—excluding humanoids—like zoophilia, objectophilia, and spectrophilia. |
|||
== Controversy== |
|||
This term is controversial in whether it is harmful or not, due to the fact that many Pokémon can communicate through non-verbal (and even sometimes verbal) ways. However, the sexualization of Pokémon is often shown through illustrated images of sexual slavery, as Pokémon are, in many cases, unable to deny their master’s commands. |
|||
==Acceptable attraction== |
|||
There are some Pokémon that are acceptable to hold attraction to, specifically if they fit the following criteria: |
|||
*They are consenting in the imagery/writing. |
|||
*They are not doing it ''just'' to abide to the trainer’s wishes. |
|||
*They are sapient and able to understand the implications. |
|||
*They can consent. |
|||
In these cases, this attraction is acceptable, however it would be better for one to identify as a term such as [[fictosexual]], [[anuafsexual]], [[objectum]] or similar, as Pokesexual has negative connotations. However, one may still identify as Pokesexual, so long as they clarify that their attraction is healthy. |
|||
==History== |
|||
This term appears to have been coined by Elkirbydiablo, on May 18th of 2009, through Urban Dictionary. |
|||
== Resources == |
== Resources == |
||
*https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Pok%C3%A9sexual |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
*https://twitter.com/DrawsAlisa |
*https://twitter.com/DrawsAlisa |
||
* |
*https://twitter.com/sophiemon_ |
||
* |
*https://twitter.com/DrawsAlisa/status/1341882809129041920 |
||
*https://grammarist.com/usage/sentience-vs-sapience/ |
|||
*https://bit.ly/3xmyJLQ |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:Circumstantially harmless identities]] |
|||
<br /> |
|||
[[Category:Beware]] |
[[Category:Beware]] |
||
Latest revision as of 19:01, 4 November 2021
The term Pokésexual (also Pokesexual) describes someone who is attracted to Pokémon species. Pokésexual falls under the fictiosexuality umbrella, due to Pokémon species being fictional. The attraction to Pokémon can range to animalistic, humanoid, inanimate, and spiritual, in which attributes paraphilias—excluding humanoids—like zoophilia, objectophilia, and spectrophilia.
Controversy
This term is controversial in whether it is harmful or not, due to the fact that many Pokémon can communicate through non-verbal (and even sometimes verbal) ways. However, the sexualization of Pokémon is often shown through illustrated images of sexual slavery, as Pokémon are, in many cases, unable to deny their master’s commands.
Acceptable attraction
There are some Pokémon that are acceptable to hold attraction to, specifically if they fit the following criteria:
- They are consenting in the imagery/writing.
- They are not doing it just to abide to the trainer’s wishes.
- They are sapient and able to understand the implications.
- They can consent.
In these cases, this attraction is acceptable, however it would be better for one to identify as a term such as fictosexual, anuafsexual, objectum or similar, as Pokesexual has negative connotations. However, one may still identify as Pokesexual, so long as they clarify that their attraction is healthy.
History
This term appears to have been coined by Elkirbydiablo, on May 18th of 2009, through Urban Dictionary.